Friday, June 11, 2010

Urban Architecture | Urban Planners of Earth; We Need to Talk

If we are going to get serious about cutting down on the CO2 emissions and urban heat to slow the so-called Global Warming impending disasters then we need to get together and talk about how we design our cities and how humans live in these urban settings.

We need to discuss the saving of energy and even perhaps the coating of roads and design cities to be efficient without traffic bottlenecks which makes surface transportation idle and put endless CO2 into the air. What we need is to get serious and the sooner the better.

What Can You Do?

Good question, why not try living a carbon free life. Consider how much CO2 you are responsible for? You own an SUV, better get off your butt and plant four trees please. Look around your home and by efficient lighting and pay attention to your appliances too; may as well save some water too while you are at it.

What Can Planners Do?

Well why not join us all online to brainstorm and learn what others are doing? Urban Planet is a spectacular website for anyone interested in the future of transportation, urban planning, downtown revitalization, modern architecture, solutions to density and healthy environments in urban areas.

This is a huge site with 100s of thousands of posts from some true leading edge thinkers and observers of mankind's city dwellers. The concepts discussed are amazing. You will most likely learn a lot each time you visit, with new material posted daily from people around the world. http://www.UrbanPlanet.org Forums.

We all need to work together and now is a really good time to start. I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you in your quest to be the best in 2007. I thank you for reading my many articles on diverse subjects, which interest you.

"Lance Winslow" - Online Think Tank forum board. If you have innovative thoughts and unique perspectives, come think with Lance; www.WorldThinkTank.net/. Lance is an online writer in retirement.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Lance_Winslow

Urban Architecture | The New American Urbanism

American readers are going to be thrilled by this: somebody out there is trying to build a new America - without Americans, that is. And, to be more specific, it is the European Union (EU), Putin's New Russia and Capitalist China the ones that are trying to do it. They all call this trend the 'New American Urbanism'.

The New American Urbanism is what city planners, architects, civil engineers, developers, realtors, appraisers and bankers throughout the United States refer to as simply 'Urbanism'. It is the way so familiar to us all in which cities, towns and communities have been conceived, planned and built. There is nothing new about it, since Urbanism in the United States and to a lesser extent Canada is a phenomenon that dates all the way back to the Seventies. It is just the very practical way North American cities are structured: a mix of shopping, residential and light industrial districts effectively connected by a system of boulevards, roads, streets and alleys. Residential neighborhoods are comprised of mixed-use housing clustered with schools, sports centers, wide sidewalks and essentially with everything at close range from home.

Business is carried out in the city centre areas or in downtowns, with the typical characteristic skyline of concrete high-rise and low-rise buildings. One would not think that all this would cause such an uproar. But it has. There are three specific reasons for the rest of the world to all of sudden rediscover America and to put it (again) under the microscope: time, money and economy of scale. The EU, Russia and China all face the common dilemma of having to relocate millions and millions of people on relatively short notice and share the common denominator of minimizing social cost and maximizing affordability.

With the collapse of European borders and the fast-approaching disappearance of singular national identities, the urban trend throughout Europe nowadays is to create centers where jobs are being relocated and redeveloped. Cities and towns must follow the people who, in turn, follow economic prosperity wherever they may find it. As such, it is imperative that a social and living thread be created quickly and swiftly anywhere there is a need for it. Call it the logistics of capitalism, but the EU cannot possibly achieve its coveted objective of creating a free market zone of 600 million or so people, double the one in North America, if this area cannot be properly connected, effectively serviced and economically integrated.

Likewise, it has been over a decade that Russia is in the process of abating the old Stalinist organization of a modern, self-sufficient European Russia on one side surrounded by a cluster of backwards Asian republics and Putin - the former KGB boss - has now become for domestic political reasons the chief architect of the new Russian social integration. Consequently, the republic is now in the process of developing far away areas the likes of northern Siberia and the East Urals, and will shortly be facing the huge problem of having to accommodate, house, connect and integrate millions and millions of domestic migrants and workers.

China suffers of an ailment called 'one side development': its coastal areas, home to thirty-five percent of China's 1.3 billion people are expanding at the rate of 10 percent per year and have been doing so for the past decade, while the remaining sixty-five percent of the population living in the hinterland is housed in communities where running water is thought of as the ultimate luxury. Chinese leadership is very much aware of the economic rift that exists between the affluent, modern and westernized city dwellers on one side and the poor, uneducated and hopeless inhabitants of the countryside, as well as the tension, envy and huge social unrest that this situation - if not resolved quickly - will inevitably lead to.

Hence, America. Using standardized models of development it has occurred to urban planners throughout the globe to think (possibly at the same time) that it takes Americans four years to fully build, connect, develop, service and integrate from scratch a standardized community for 30,000 people. This would include building roads, viaducts, railway, shopping centers, living dwellings, parks, sidewalks, streets, lighting, school and sports facilities, utility installations such as electricity, telephone lines, cables, sewers, water mains, a small airport as well as plant trees everywhere. Furthermore, the typical housing construction time in the United States, counted from digging a hole in the ground to giving the keys to the owner, is five and a half months. Using the same standardized models but applied to different construction and development methods, it would take seven years for Western Europeans to accomplish the same objective, with the average housing construction time running to about one year. The Russians would take almost ten years to do the same, with a typical housing construction time of one year and data is unavailable for the Chinese - but it is common belief that it would take them longer than the Russians to build this model town in the countryside.

Moreover, what foreigners especially cherish of North American cities, towns and neighborhoods is the economy of scale: the more you build, the less expensive it gets. And, naturally, the fact that environmental concerns are of paramount importance, particularly in Canada. So much so, in fact, that Europeans have banded together none other than in Stockholm to draft, well ... The Charter of Stockholm, in fact, where the Council for European Urbanism has adopted officially as its mission the objective of maintaining and preserving the well being and integration of the present and future generations by building cities, towns and villages speedily and with mixed-use with architectural lines, construction techniques, planning and management modeled upon American cities.

Seems that somebody is eating back a lot of criticism these days ...

Luigi Frascati

Luigi Frascati is a Real Estate Agent based in Vancouver, British Columbia. He holds a Bachelor Degree in Economics and maintains a weblog entitled the Real Estate Chronicle at http://wwwrealestatechronicle.blogspot.com where you can find the full collection of his articles. Luigi is associated with the Sutton Group, the largest real estate organization in Canada, and is based with Sutton-Centre Realty in Burnaby, BC.

Luigi is very proud to be an EzineArticles Platinum Expert Author. Your rating at the footer of this Article is very much appreciated. Thank you.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Luigi_Frascati

Urban Architecture | Loft Living - Redefining Urban Lifestyles

Defining what actually constitutes a loft condo is a highly debated question. Loft purists often have a very different connotation than definitions popularly used by developers creating new construction loft projects.

The loft movement first became popular in the SoHo section of New York City during the 1960s. Artist created living spaces on the upper-levels industrial of obsolete industrial buildings. These late 19th-century period buildings had prior uses as factories, sweatshops and warehouses. In the pioneering period of SoHo lofts, most SoHo buildings not zoned as residential and the lofts were being used illegally as living space. In 1971, New York City legalized the residential use of space in the SoHo and loft living became popular throughout the neighborhood. Loft living spread to other previously industrial Manhattan neighborhoods including Tribeca, Chelsea and Greenwich Village.

Beyond NY, Bohemian loft districts were established in other large urban cities including the Fulton River District in Chicago, the Warehouse District in Cleveland, the North Loop in Minneapolis, Washington Avenue in St. Louis, and Logan Circle in Washington, DC. One of the tragedies of the ongoing gentrification of these urban neighborhoods is that the artists that first established loft areas are now priced out of many of these areas.

Key features of former industrial space that makes for attractive reuse as a loft include high ceilings, large industrial windows, exposed brick or cinder block walls, unfinished ceilings and exposed duct work. Many industrial reuse lofts have only partial height walls separating rooms or areas within the space. Some lofts even have industrial-era freight elevators that open into the living space.

A more recent trend, which is particularly popular in Washington, DC, is to build new construction loft developments. Developers recreate the industrial feel of loft architecture with exposed duct work, dual level living, high ceilings and industrial finishes. While these purpose-built "loftominiums" don't have the raw, bohemian feel of a traditional industrial reuse loft, they have proven very popular with buyers in the seeking an urban lifestyle in the Washington, DC market.

Mark Washburn is a real estate agent serving the urban Washington, DC market. Mark and his team can assist clients in their search for a DC loft, condo or town home in neighborhoods throughout the District including Adams Morgan, Capitol Hill, Columbia Heights, Dupont Circle, Foggy Bottom, Georgetown, Logan Circle, Mount Vernon Triangle, Penn Quarter, Shaw, U Street Corridor and the West End.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mark_M._Washburn